Cordrey Services
Who I work with · Solicitors & law firms

AI and automation for solicitors and law firms

More billable hours without more hours: client documents collected and chased by software, attendance notes captured and filed the same day, and an internal assistant that answers from your firm’s own documents, with citations, and refuses to guess. Confidentiality is designed in from the first conversation.

In one paragraph

What can a law firm safely automate?

The safe ground is the administration around legal work: chasing and collecting client documents, triaging the shared inbox, turning meetings into filed attendance notes, and internal assistants that answer only from the firm’s own documents with citations. Legal judgement stays with fee earners; drafting for review is the frontier, and autopilot is not on the table.

Where the hours go

The week you already know by heart.

The collection

Matters stall waiting for documents.

ID, forms, signatures, evidence: progress on the matter is hostage to the client’s inbox, and the chasing lands on fee earners and support staff whose time is worth far more than a reminder.

The notes

Attendance notes are written twice or not at all.

The meeting happens, the note gets typed later from memory, and the file is only as good as that evening’s discipline. The record-keeping your file reviews depend on should not depend on willpower.

The trust problem

Generic AI tools guess. In law, guessing is a liability.

A chatbot that invents an authority is worse than no chatbot. The bar for legal use is grounded answers: drawn from your documents, with citations, refusing when it does not know. That bar is now reachable.

The hand-off

What moves to software, and what stays with you.

The pattern that survives professional scrutiny is drafts and checks, not autopilot: software chases, files and drafts; a person approves anything that touches a client or a court. On real firm processes:

Client document collection How it works →

By hand todayChased by fee earners over email

With softwareRequested, checked and filed by software

Inbox and enquiry triage How it works →

By hand todayEverything lands in one pile

With softwareSorted and routed; the urgent reaches a person fast

Attendance notes and file records How it works →

By hand todayTyped from memory after the event

With softwareCaptured, structured and filed the same day

An internal assistant on your own documents How it works →

By hand todayKnowledge lives in senior heads

With softwareAnswers with citations; refuses to guess

Recurring reports and packs How it works →

By hand todayBuilt page by page, by hand

With softwareAssembled on demand, checked by a person

Proof

Judge the work, not the promises.

The grounded-assistant claim is the one to test hardest, so it is the one with a working system behind it:

The full showcase, with live links, is on the Labs page; the system behind all of it is the Software Factory.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality and privilege set the rules.

Nothing here sends your matters to a public chatbot. Systems are designed so client material stays inside services under the firm’s control, encrypted in transit and at rest where it matters, with providers configured not to train on your data and an audit trail showing who saw what. Anything ambiguous is asked about before it is built. The written homework:

Ways in

Start small. Prove it. Then compound.

When the win is proven there are retainers to keep it compounding, the Software Factory for custom systems, and Managed Websites for the whole web presence, run for you.

Do the homework free

Read before you buy anything.

The knowledge base exists so you can check my thinking before we ever speak. Start here:

Common questions

Questions firms ask.

Does client material end up in a public AI model?

No. Systems are designed so matter files and client data stay inside services under the firm’s control, encrypted in transit and at rest where it matters, with AI providers configured not to train on your data. Where everything is stored, who can read it and how it is deleted are written down before anything is built.

What about hallucinations?

Grounded assistants are built the other way round from public chatbots: they answer only from documents you supply, cite the passage they drew on, and say so when the answer is not there. And for anything client-facing, a person approves the output; nothing goes out on a model’s say-so.

Will this work with our case management system?

The default is to build on what you already run: your case management system, document store and Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, connected by automation rather than replaced. Where no ready-made connector exists, one can be built.

Is this compatible with our professional duties?

That is the design brief, not an afterthought. Confidentiality, supervision and record-keeping duties shape what gets built, a named person stays accountable for every output, and the governance is written down so you can show an insurer or a file reviewer exactly how it works.

Where do law firms usually start?

Document collection and inbox triage: high relief, low risk, and nowhere near the legal judgement. Sift, the free scorer on this site, ranks your own candidates in a few minutes; the Automation Audit maps the whole firm formally.

Turn admin hours back into billable ones.

Sift is free and runs in your browser: list the processes that eat the firm’s week, answer four quick questions about each, and leave with a ranked shortlist of what to automate first, and what to leave alone.

Get my automation shortlist

Prefer to talk it through first? Book a free 30-minute call.

Get the weekly journal

One email a week on AI and automation for financial services firms. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Got a question instead?